| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Super Love PhD |
Re: Mr. Fahruz's Therapy Room. PRIVATE-no visitors please. | ||
|
Posts: 3035 (12/25/07 21:23:11) **Status Clitical** |
Sh-h-h-h-h!
No, Lord Fahruz. It was nothing. Your sessions are private. Go ahead. Tell the Doctor more about serial failed first dates. Have you been a nice boy and girl this year?
|
||
|
Super Love PhD |
Re: Mr. Fahruz's Therapy Room. PRIVATE-no visitors please. | ||
|
Posts: 3035 (12/29/07 22:12:11) **Status Clitical** |
No. They cannot be returned after you have worn them. They are regarded as single use items.
Have you been a nice boy and girl this year?
|
||
|
Super Love PhD |
Re: Mr. Fahruz's Therapy Room. PRIVATE-no visitors please. | ||
|
Posts: 3035 (01/01/08 11:51:28) **Status Clitical** |
Give it time. There are still 364 days left in 2008.
Have you been a nice boy and girl this year?
|
||
|
Harry Paget Flashman |
Re: Mr. Fahruz's Therapy Room. PRIVATE-no visitors please. | ||
|
Posts: 10259 (01/01/08 23:24:46) {9}Giant Big Man Club{9} |
This thread would be better with footnotes.
"Grattez votre twanger magique, froggy !!"
|
||
|
Super Love PhD |
|||
|
Posts: 3021 (02/04/08 23:05:23) **Status Clitical** |
Sh-h-h.
Have you been a nice boy and girl this year?
|
||
|
rince1wind |
|||
|
Posts: 3645 (02/05/08 20:00:54) **Let's Enjoy With Me** |
Maybe some illicit thread-tapping?
|
||
|
Spoony |
|||
|
Posts: 233 (02/05/08 23:27:18) |
Let's bumping threads!
Welcome to your enquire for the Spoony. Lets spoony with me! Please be sure that Spoony you are acceptable.
|
||
|
Super Love PhD |
|||
|
Posts: 3027 (02/11/08 22:33:26) **Status Clitical** |
It will be tricky removing that yourself, Lord Fahruz. You don't have the reach for proper retrieval. See a discreet doctor.
Have you been a nice boy and girl this year?
|
||
|
Super Love PhD |
|||
|
Posts: 3033 (07/05/08 19:29:53) **Status Clitical** |
Lord Fahruz. Can you hear the Doctor? It's intelligent conversation like this that keeps me coming back to this thread instead of
clinging to my guns and religion. The heat death of the universe is an untested scenario under which continued expansion results in a universe that is too cold
to sustain life and puts the cosmic kibosh on life as we know it. It hasn't ever happened so we cannot know it can happen. It can occur only under a
fulgent curvilinear or hyperbolic geometry in a universe that expands forever. With an apositive cosmological constant, it could also occur in a closed
universe. But I doubt it. Heat Death states that the universe goes to a state of maximum entropy in which everything is evenly distributed and without
gradients. Gradients are a sine qua non for life. The Heat Death scenario is compatible with other spatial models, but requires that the universe reach an
eventual temperature minimum. I see a finite lifespan for the universe. The end state of the universe will be a singularity, as the dark energy density and
expansion rate becomes infinite. This scenario allows the Big Bang to have been immediately preceded by the Big Crunch of a preceding universe. If this occurs
repeatedly, we have an oscillatory universe. The universe could then consist of an infinite sequence of finite universes, each finite universe ending with a
Big Crunch that is also the Big Bang of the next universe. Theoretically, the oscillating universe could not be reconciled with the second law of
thermodynamics: entropy would build up from oscillation to oscillation and cause heat death or at least a rash. According to the Big Bang theory of cosmology,
in the beginning the universe had infinite density. Such a description seems to be at odds with everything else in physics, and especially quantum mechanics
and its uncertainty principle. It is not surprising, therefore, that quantum mechanics has given rise to an alternative version of the Big Bang theory. Also,
if the universe is closed, this theory would predict that once this universe collapses it will spawn another universe in an event similar to the Big Bang after
a universal singularity is reached or a repulsive quantum force causes re-expansion. Cosmic uncertainty really worries me. Each possibility is based on very
simple form for the dark energy equation of state. But as the name is meant to imply, we know almost nothing of the real physics of the dark energy. Except
that that is darker than a ++@%%%%#$@*#. If the theory of inflation is true, the universe went through an episode dominated by a different form of dark energy
in the first moments of the big bang; but inflation ended, indicating an equation of state much more complicated than those assumed so far for present-day dark
energy. It is possible that the dark energy equation of state could change again resulting in an event that would have consequences which are extremely
difficult to parametrize or predict. Choosing among these rival scenarios is done by 'weighing' the universe, for example, measuring the relative
contributions of matter, radiation, dark matter, darthvader and dark energy to the critical density. More concretely, competing scenarios are evaluated against
data on galaxy clustering and distant supernovae, and on the anisotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background. Dyson's eternal intelligence hypothesis
proposes that an advanced civilization could survive for an effectively infinite period of time while consuming only a finite amount of energy. Such a
civilization would alternate brief periods of activity with ever longer periods of hibernation. John Barrow and Frank J. Tipler (1986) propose a Final
anthropic principle: the emergence of intelligent life is inevitable, and once such life comes into being somewhere in the universe, it will never die out.
Barrow and Tipler go even further: the eventual fate of intelligent life is to permeate and control the entire universe in all respects but one: intelligence
cannot halt the Big Crunch. Moreover, it will not want to do so because the main source of energy in a universe undergoing a Big Crunch will be a hot spot in
the sky arising from an asymmetrical contraction of the universe. They speculate that the required asymmetry will be engineered by some form of intelligent
life. Tipler's Omega point scenario (Tipler 1994) concludes that the reverse of the eternal intelligence scenario would be the case for a civilization
caught in the final stages of a Big Crunch. Such a civilization would, in effect, experience an infinite amount of "subjective" time during the
remaining finite life of the universe, using the enormous energy of the Crunch to accelerate information processing faster than the approach of the final
singularity. Though possible in theory, it is not obvious whether there will ever exist technologies that will make any of these scenarios feasible. Moreover,
effective solutions may be indistinguishable from the present state of our universe. In other words, if beings cannot stop the universe from collapsing, at
least they can use the energy of the collapse to simulate future universes that resemble the ending universe, but with artificial or compressed time scales.
Recent work in inflationary cosmology, string theory, and quantum mechanics has moved the discussion of the ultimate fate of the universe in directions
distinct from the scenarios set out by Dyson and Tipler. Theoretical work by Eric Chaisson and David Layzer finds that an expanding spacetime gives rise to an
increasing "entropy gap", casting doubt on the heat death hypothesis. Invoking Ilya Prigogine's work on far-from-equilibrium thermodynamics,
their analysis suggests that this entropy gap may contribute to information, and hence to the formation of structure. Meanwhile, Andrei Linde, Alan Guth,
Edward Harrison, and Ernest Sternglass argue that inflationary cosmology strongly suggests the presence of a Multiverse, and that it would be practical even
with today's knowledge for intelligent beings to generate and transmit de novo information into a distinct universe. Alan Guth has speculated that a
civilization at the top of the Kardashev scale might create fine-tuned universes in a continuation of the evolutionary drive to exist, grow, and multiply. This
has been further developed by the Selfish Biocosm Hypothesis, and by the proposal that the existence of the fundamental physical constants may be subject to a
Darwinian evolution of Universes.[1] Moreover, recent theoretical work on the unresolved quantum gravity problem and the Holographic Principle suggests that
traditional physical quantities may possibly themselves be describable in terms of exchanges of information, which in turn raises questions about the
applicability of older cosmological models. Many religions have an end-of-the-universe prediction. The theological study of the ultimate fate of the universe
and/or ultimate destiny of mankind is known as eschatology. Many religious beliefs are cataclysmic, and some theists do not view the various scientific
theories about the end of the universe as contradicting their religious beliefs. In fact, some theist argue that such scientific theories validate
end-of-the-universe predictions. Your thoughts?
Have you been a nice boy and girl this year?
|
||
|
hwnut1994.joesdiecastshack |
|||
|
Posts: 25 (08/06/08 14:15:14) |
We all favorite 2,000 character limit game!
The thought is had end. Please, grow back to a home.
Scanner something error happens.
www.Engrish.com |
||
|
coffeebot |
|||
|
Posts: 6299 (08/08/08 20:15:17) {5}Beware of Safety{5} |
escatology:
ultimate density is. my thought exactly. |
||
|
howdydave |
|||
|
Posts: 436 (03/26/09 09:36:34) Life Style Dispenser |
Howdy!
I am a new patient here... Please exprain how to therapize myself. Thank you so much!
Dave ɿɬ
|
||
